Jump to content

User talk:Divyachick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Divyachick, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 03:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

April 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Satveer Chaudhary has been reverted.
Your edit here to Satveer Chaudhary was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://chaudharylawoffice.blogspot.com/, http://sportsmanlawyers.blogspot.com/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

[edit]

Hi Divyachick, and thanks for leaving feedback. Bot reverts can indeed be frustrating - if something's on their blacklist, it gets reverted; they aren't capable of considering the purpose of the edit they're reverting. In the case of XLinkBot, blog-hosting sites such as blogspot.com trip its filters; blogs aren't used as sources on Wikipedia, so usually a blogspot link tends to be the blog owner trying to drive traffic to their site - linkspam, effectively. You are allowed to revert the bot if your edit was genuine.

Yunshui  09:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]